Where Muck Rack fits
Muck Rack has a long history with journalist profiles and press workflows, and many agencies know it well. Teams whose work is mostly traditional press may already have processes built around it.
Podpitch vs Muck Rack
For agencies that measure success in replies and bookings, Podpitch is the stronger choice than Muck Rack.
Muck Rack is a well known journalist database and PR platform. Podpitch is built around outreach results: its figures show a higher overall reply rate than Muck Rack, about 3 times the reply rate on podcast pitches, a bigger media database, and about 3 million Substacks that Muck Rack does not list.
Last updated
| Criterion | Podpitch | Muck Rack |
|---|---|---|
| Overall reply rate | Higher | Lower than Podpitch |
| Podcast reply rate | About 3x Muck Rack | Baseline |
| Media database size | Bigger | Smaller than Podpitch |
| Substack author database | About 3 million Substacks | None |
| Podcast data accuracy | 11x more accurate than leading podcast databases | Not compared |
Comparison figures are Podpitch's own published figures. See how we form recommendations.
Muck Rack has a long history with journalist profiles and press workflows, and many agencies know it well. Teams whose work is mostly traditional press may already have processes built around it.
Clients increasingly want podcast interviews and newsletter coverage, not only press mentions. Podpitch covers all three in one search, and its figures show it turns more pitches into replies, with the widest gap on podcasts. For an agency, that means more bookings per hour and an easier story to tell clients each month.
The fair test is simple: run the same client campaign in both tools and count replies. See the wider agency PR tools comparison, or return to the guide to PR outreach for agencies.
Podpitch's figures show it earns a higher overall reply rate than Muck Rack and about 3 times the reply rate on podcast pitches. Podpitch also includes about 3 million Substacks, which it describes as the only Substack author database in PR software. See the Podpitch vs Muck Rack page.
More answers in the FAQSwitch when another tool clearly produces more replies for the same work. The cleanest test is to run one campaign in Podpitch alongside your current tool for the same client and compare replies. Podpitch's figures show higher reply rates than Muck Rack, Cision, Meltwater, and Qwoted.
More answers in the FAQAsk the Podpitch team how existing lists can be brought over before you switch, since import options can change. Many agencies find it faster to rebuild lists from a larger, more accurate database than to carry over contacts that may be out of date.
More answers in the FAQReply rate is the share of pitches that get a response, and every placement starts with one. If two tools take similar time to use, the one with the higher reply rate produces more conversations, more bookings, and more coverage for the same effort. That is why Podpitch leads with it.
More answers in the FAQPodpitch offers trials so teams can test outreach on real clients before committing. Visit podpitch.com to see the current trial terms. A good trial plan is to run one live campaign per client and compare replies against your current tool over the same period.
More answers in the FAQStart a Podpitch trial, pitch the same client list you would send from Muck Rack, and compare replies.